Monday, September 11, 2006

Enlightenment

tolle_picture

The word enlightenment conjures up the idea of some super-human accomplishment, and the ego likes to keep it that way, but it is simply your natural state of felt oneness with Being. It is a state of connectedness with something immeasurable and indestructible, something that, almost paradoxically, is essentially you and yet is much greater than you. It is finding your true nature beyond name and form. The inability to feel this connectedness gives rise to the illusion of separation, from yourself and from the world around you. You then perceive yourself, consciously or unconsciously, as an isolated fragment. Fear arises, and conflict within and without becomes the norm.

I love the Buddha's simple definition of enlightenment as "the end of suffering." There is nothing superhuman in that, is there? Of course, as a definition it is incomplete. It only tells you what enlightenment is not: no suffering. But what's left when there is no more suffering? The Buddha is silent on that, and his silence implies that you'll have to find out for yourself. He uses a negative definition, so that the mind cannot make it into something to believe in or into a superhuman accomplishment, a goal that is impossible for you to attain. Despite this precaution, the majority of Buddhists still believe that enlightenment is for the Buddha, not for them, at least not in this lifetime.

Excerpt from the Power of Now, by Eckhart Tolle

1 comment:

Lg said...

I remember the end of suffering part that Tolle mentions. Somehow, Eckhart Tolle's words seem new and fresh everytime I read them. It is almost as if the memory clears out all traces before one reads again.

But this end of suffering piece is something that I do remember because it was so striking - i.e. put forth in an end of negative instead of feel the positive manner.

Thanks for sharing this.